Friday, January 17, 2025

Met Office: Atmospheric CO2 rise now exceeding IPCC 1.5C pathways

Must read


The rate at which atmospheric CO2 is increasing is now outpacing the pathways set out by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that limit global warming to 1.5C.

This is what the latest data shows from the Mauna Loa observatory in Hawaii, where measurements of CO2 levels in the atmosphere have been collected for more than 60 years. 

In 2024, the rise in atmospheric CO2 was one of the fastest on record. 

Emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases from human activity have so far caused human-caused global warming to reach about 1.3C above pre-industrial levels. 

If warming is to be limited to 1.5C, as set out in the Paris Agreement, the build-up of CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere will need to slow to a halt and then go into reverse. 

And, yet, the rise in atmospheric CO2 concentrations is still showing no signs of slowing. 

Pathways to 1.5C

The third working group report of the IPCC’s sixth assessment report (AR6), published in 2022, presented a set of seven “illustrative pathways” that highlight how different mitigation choices across major economic sectors translate into future greenhouse gas emissions and global temperatures.

In the three most-ambitious pathways, global warming has a 50% chance of either staying below 1.5C, or overshooting it by only 0.1C (for up to several decades) before then returning to below 1.5C:

  • Shifting pathways (IMP-SP): Illustrates mitigation in the context of a broader shift towards sustainable development, including by reducing inequality and with a phase-out of fossil fuels.
  • Low demand (IMP-LD): Illustrates a strong emphasis on energy-demand reductions, and with a phase-out of fossil fuels.
  • Renewables (IMP-Ren): Illustrates a future with a heavy reliance on renewable energy.

As the table below shows, the build-up of atmospheric CO2 in these three scenarios slows from the 2010s average of 2.41 parts per million per year (ppm/year) to 1.33-1.79ppm/year in the 2020s. 

It then slows still further and goes into reverse either in the 2030s or 2040s – in other words, the level of CO2 in the atmosphere actually begins to fall. 

Decade Projected average CO2 rise (ppm/year) in scenarios limiting global warming to1.5C
C1-IMP-LD C1-IMP-REN C1-IMP-SP
2020s 1.33 1.75 1.79
2030s -0.14 0.13 0.57
2040s -0.53 -0.46 -0.7
2050s -0.65 -0.61 -0.41

Large CO2 rise in 2024

Yet, not only are atmospheric CO2 concentrations still rising, the rate of rise is accelerating. 

The build-up of CO2 in the atmosphere has been monitored at the Mauna Loa observatory in Hawaii since 1958. 

As illustrated by the iconic Keeling Curve below, the increase has been accelerating over the decades (blue line) due to ongoing emissions of CO2 from burning fossil fuels and changing land use. 

So while the curve needs to rapidly bend in the other direction to hold warming to 1.5C (light red line), the rate of rising CO2 marches onwards and upwards.

chart

Monthly CO2 concentrations at Mauna Loa from observations up to 2024 (blue) and the IPCC C1-IMP-SP scenario consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5C (light red). Also shown is the Met Office forecast for 2025 (red).

The table below sets out decadal averages of the annual rise in CO2 concentrations at Mauna Loa. The first half of the 2020s has seen an average CO2 rise of 2.58ppm/year, which is 44-94% higher than it needs to be to track the IPCC 1.5C-compatible scenarios.

Decade Observed average CO2 rise (ppm/year)
1960s 0.86
1970s 1.22
1980s 1.58
1990s 1.55
2000s 1.91
2010s 2.41
2020s (2020-2024) 2.58

In fact, the annual rise of 3.58ppm/year between 2023 and 2024 at Mauna Loa was the fastest on record. 

The global average, which has been monitored by satellite since 2003, also showed a large rise last year – and, at 2.9ppm/year, this was the second largest on record after 2015-16.  

(While the rise at Mauna Loa mirrors the global rise over long periods, in the short term it can also be affected by localised effects, such as fires upwind or in the same hemisphere, before the CO2 disperses more evenly across the globe.)

Global CO2 emissions were also at a record high in 2024, but a further key factor was that natural land carbon “sinks” were substantially weaker, allowing more of the emitted CO2 to remain in the atmosphere.

At least some of this weakening of land carbon sinks was associated with the El Niño conditions in the first part of the year. El Niño events shift weather patterns around the globe, leading to hotter, drier conditions in many parts of the tropics. This means that vegetation grows less well and more carbon is released from decay in soils and from wildfires, leading to land ecosystems removing less carbon from the atmosphere than usual.

With the El Niño now subsided and conditions shifting more towards the opposite pattern of La Niña, natural land carbon sinks can be expected to recover again, at least to some extent. 

As a result, in our Met Office forecast of the CO2 rise at Mauna Loa, we predict a slower rate of rise between 2024 and 2025 than between 2023 and 2024. The projected increase is 2.26ppm (with an uncertainty range of ±0.56ppm) – slightly slower than it would have been without the effects of La Niña.

However, even this is still too fast to stay on track with the IPCC 1.5C-compatible scenarios. This is highlighted in the chart below, which shows the annual change in CO2 levels at Mauna Loa since 1995 (blue lines) and how our forecast for 2025 (red point) exceeds a pathway consistent with 1.5C (grey plume).

Comparison of recent and forecast annual change in atmospheric CO2 concentration
Comparison of recent and forecast annual change in atmospheric CO2 concentration with an illustrative scenario limiting global warming to 1.5C. Light blue thin line: Annual change in CO2 concentration at the Mauna Loa observatory from observations. Mid-blue thin line: Annual increments in CO2 concentration at the Mauna Loa observatory reconstructed using statistical relationship between concentrations, emissions and the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Red dot with vertical error bars: the 2025 forecast increment. Dark blue thick line and dark blue dot: estimated increments without the influence of ENSO. Grey plume: simulated CO2 concentrations in the C1-IMP-SP scenario limiting global warming to 1.5C with >50% likelihood.

Faster rise than expected

The specific reasons for the very large increase in CO2 in 2024 are not yet completely clear, although weaker land carbon sinks appear to be implicated. 

We had forecast the 2023-24 CO2 rise at Mauna Loa to be 2.84ppm (±0.54) – faster than the average of the previous decade due to the El Niño. We had also highlighted the possibility that it could be the fastest annual rise on record. 

However, the actual CO2 rise of 3.58ppm was even faster than expected. This was above the upper limit of our uncertainty range, which should include the forecast value 95% of the time.

Although carbon emissions from fossil fuel burning and deforestation were also at a record high in 2024, this does not fully explain the shortfall in our forecast. 

Our forecast method uses the global emissions from the previous year as one of the inputs. The emissions in 2024 were estimated to have been 11.3bn tonnes of carbon (GtC), slightly higher than the 2023 value of 11.1GtC used in our forecast. 

This 0.2GtC difference is equivalent to about 0.09ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere. So, even if we had used the larger value in our forecast, the observed rise would still have been beyond our uncertainty range.

Therefore, the origin of the discrepancy must be related to natural carbon sinks, which must have been even weaker than the expected weakening that occurred as a result of the 2023-24 El Niño.

Weaker land carbon sinks

Scientists had already established that land carbon sinks were exceptionally weak in 2023, with very high temperatures worldwide playing a part in this. 

2024 was then even hotter than 2023 – and indeed was the first calendar year where warming exceeded 1.5C above pre-industrial levels. It can be expected that the climatic conditions this warmer year once again led to weaker global land carbon sink.

Both North and South America saw high temperatures and exceptionally severe fires in 2024, including in regions not normally affected by El Niño such as Canada, and extending beyond the season of El Niño influence. 

Global fire emissions were estimated as 1.6-2.2GtC over January-September 2024, 11-32% above the 2014-23 average for the same months.

Moreover, fire emissions in the northern hemisphere were 0.5-0.6 GtC per year, which was 26-44% above the average of 2014-23. Since Mauno Loa is in the northern hemisphere, this may explain why the local rise there was even larger than the global average. 

A portion of these fire emissions may already be accounted for in the above estimate of land-use emissions, but it is not possible to quantify this. Nevertheless, widespread fire activity likely contributed to the large rise in atmospheric CO2 concentrations in 2024.  Further analysis is needed to quantify the size of this contribution.

Climate change itself may have played a role in enhancing fire emissions. For example, human-caused warming made the “unprecedented” wildfires that spread across Brazil’s Pantanal wetlands in June 2024 between four and five times more likely.

Although land carbon sinks are generally increasing as a result of rising CO2, Earth system model projections have long indicated that ongoing global warming would reduce this effect, leading to a greater proportion of human-caused emissions remaining in the atmosphere. 

Calculations suggest that this has already been occurring in recent years, so a key question is whether the last two years have seen an acceleration. If natural carbon sinks weaken more than already expected, this would further increase the difficulty of slowing the rise in atmospheric CO2 concentrations.

Alternatively, there are a number of historical years for which our CO2 forecast procedure gives almost as large departures between predictions and outcomes as for 2024. For example, 2003 saw a large rise at Mauna Loa despite not being an El Niño year, due to large fires in Siberia. It will therefore be important to see whether there is a higher-than-expected rise in CO2 in 2025, or whether the large exceedance in 2024 is a temporary phenomenon.      

With global warming ongoing, extremely high temperatures will continue to occur more frequently and severely, so events such as those seen in 2023 and 2024 could play an ever more important role in the global carbon cycle. 

The contribution of fires attributed to climate change is consistent with model simulations which suggest that global fire activity will already be weakening land carbon sinks. Further monitoring of the global carbon cycle will help to reveal whether this is indeed the case.  

Sharelines from this story



Admin (7)

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest article